The petition for review is granted. Further action is this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in Brinker Restaurant v. Superior Court, S166350 (see Cal. rules of Court, rule 8.524 (c)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.528, is deferred pending further order of the court. Votes: George, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Moreno and Corrigan, JJ.Kudos to Kim Kralowec and the other counsel whose efforts securing review here clearly paid off.
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
California Supreme Court Grants Review in Faulkinbury v. Boyd & Associates
On October 13, 2010, the California Supreme Court granted review of the Fourth Distirct's decision in Faulkinbury v. Boyd & Associates, Inc., 185 Cal. App. 4th 1363 (2010). I previously discussed this case in a post located here. As stated on the California Supreme Court’s website, briefing on the case is deferred pending the Court’s decision in Brinker: